Georgia Pilot

Georgia PI firms: yield per inquiry is the lever you still control.

Tort-reform discussion in Georgia has put pressure on case value and case selection across the state. Firms cannot control the legislative environment. They can control how many of the inquiries they already generate become signed matters.

Context, not legal or legislative advice: SB 68 and related 2025 Georgia tort-reform measures affect civil litigation procedure and damages. Firms should confirm current status with their own counsel or bar association. See claim disclosures.

Pilot terms

  • Full price. This is a real deployment at full price, not a discounted trial.
  • Day-90 review. Baseline, deployment, and results are reviewed together at day 90.
  • Publication only with permission. Any results are published only if the firm agrees in writing.
  • ICP floor: Revenue-at-Risk.Modeled at ≥$25,000/month from slow or inconsistent intake response, with ≥$5,000/month in paid media driving inquiries.
  • Practice areas accepted: personal injury and related intake-driven practice areas.

What the firm provides

  • One month of call/inquiry logs
  • Read access to the firm’s CRM (Clio, Lawmatics, Filevine, MyCase, or other)

What ShiFt provides

  • ShiFt First Touch™ instant response to new inquiries
  • Qualification against the firm’s intake criteria
  • Persistent, multi-channel follow-up
  • Consultation booking
  • Full-funnel attribution from inquiry to signed matter

We do not have a law-firm case study yet — and we say so. The operating proof on /case-studies/titan is from a non-legal client and is presented as cross-vertical operating evidence, not a law-firm result.

Pilot selection

Practice areas